Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 89% better in War Thunder than FX-4100 - 242 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - CA$31.73 vs CA$219.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-14400F - CA$0.25 vs CA$0.9 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
242
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.9/FPS
27.77777777777778%
Price, CA$
CA$219
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$219 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
128
52.892561983471076%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$31.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$31.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |