Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 2778 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 10% better in Deathloop than Core i7-6900K - 194 vs 176 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - CA$248.88 vs CA$348.87
- Up to 22% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-14400 - CA$1.41 vs CA$1.8 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.8/FPS
78%
Price, CA$
CA$348.87
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$348.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
176
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$248.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |