Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400 is 3863 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than FX-9590 - 133 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than FX-9590 - CA$289.67 vs CA$340.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-9590 - CA$2.18 vs CA$3.04 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$289.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$289.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44093 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
112
84.21052631578947%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.04/FPS
71.71052631578948%
Price, CA$
CA$340
85%
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 220 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |