Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-10700F - 245 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$349.79 vs CA$389.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-13600K - CA$1.53 vs CA$1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
245
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.59/FPS
96%
Price, CA$
CA$389
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$389 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11410 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
228
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$349.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$349.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11410 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |