Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4279 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 44% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-2300 - 224 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$44.35 vs CA$358.98
- Up to 82% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-13600K - CA$0.28 vs CA$1.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
224
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.6/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$358.98
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$358.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
156
69%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$44.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$44.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i5-2300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |