Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-10320 - 125 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$274.32 vs CA$2358.48
- Up to 88% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-13400F - CA$2.34 vs CA$18.87 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$18.87/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$2358.48
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,358.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$274.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$274.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |