Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 73% better in F1 23 than Core i7-2600K - 284 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - CA$151.58 vs CA$319.3
- Up to 18% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-13400 - CA$0.92 vs CA$1.12 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
284
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
82%
Price, CA$
CA$319.3
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$319.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
164
57%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$151.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$151.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |