Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 4970 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Phenom X4 9550 - 211 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
211
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$269.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$269.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12600KF | vs | Phenom X4 9550 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Agena |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 11.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |