Buy on Amazon
CA$216.47
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $233
Availability
MSRP in USD: $233
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 3381 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 30% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-8300 - 266 vs 204 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - CA$83.46 vs CA$216.47
- Up to 49% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-12600 - CA$0.41 vs CA$0.81 per FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i5-12600
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
266
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
50.61728395061728%
Price, CA$
CA$216.47
38%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5 i5-12600 3.30 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for CA$216.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
204
76.69172932330827%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3.3 GHz Eight-Core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Bulk Package FX-8300
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i5-12600
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
