Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 771 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$245.99 vs CA$1676.73
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12500 - 64 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$245.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
111
89.51612903225806%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1676.73
14%
Buy for CA$1,676.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1636
70.79186499350931%
Multi-Core
14008
100%
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |