Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12500 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12500 is 1189 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 9% better in Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 191 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$244.16 vs CA$726.1
- Up to 69% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.28 vs CA$4.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12500 - 24 vs 12 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$244.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$244.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
176
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.13/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
33%
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |