Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 2317 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Minecraft than Core i7-6700T - 801 vs 681 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-6700T - CA$0.28 vs CA$0.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - CA$197.32 vs CA$226.11
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
801
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$226.11
87%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$226.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5094 minutes ago
Buy for CA$197.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5088 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |