Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 928 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 760 vs 709 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$263.11 vs CA$1181.07
- Up to 79% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$0.35 vs CA$1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
760
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$263.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$263.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
709
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.67/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$1181.07
22%
Buy for CA$1,181.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |