Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2844 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Minecraft than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 802 vs 675 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
802
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3303 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |