Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3208 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-3667U - 561 vs 505 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 17 vs 125 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
561
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i7-3667U |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 17 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |