Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 33% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i3-4130 - 174 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$78.88 vs CA$304.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-11600K - CA$0.6 vs CA$1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
174
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.75/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13033 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
131
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$78.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$78.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13034 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |