Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 4737 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 129% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Phenom X4 9650 - 473 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
473
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9434 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Agena |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 11.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |