Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2696 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2437 days newer than Xeon E5-2696 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 14% better in New World than Xeon E5-2696 v3 - 124 vs 109 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 36 vs 12 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 18 |
12 | Threads | 36 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |