Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 693 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield V than Core i9-9900T - 258 vs 241 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - CA$158.94 vs CA$277.63
- Up to 46% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-9900T - CA$0.62 vs CA$1.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$158.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$158.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Buy for CA$277.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |