Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - CA$196.23 vs CA$878.06
- Up to 67% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-14900 - CA$2.84 vs CA$8.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 46% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-11400F - 101 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
69
68%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16163 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
101
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.69/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$878.06
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$878.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |