Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 477 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 284 vs 279 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$196.23 vs CA$2420.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$0.69 vs CA$8.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 64 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
284
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10751 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
279
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.67/FPS
7%
Price, CA$
CA$2420
8%
Buy for CA$2,420 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10752 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |