Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$229.99 vs CA$479.97
- Up to 49% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-13700F - CA$1.49 vs CA$2.94 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Core i5-10600K - 163 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 24 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$229.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18770 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
163
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.94/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$479.97
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$479.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18770 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |