Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 22% better in New World than FX-8150 - 120 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - CA$87.12 vs CA$234.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing New World than Core i5-10600K - CA$0.89 vs CA$1.96 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
120
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.96/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$234.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$234.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
98
81%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |