Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$255.0 vs CA$678.98
- Up to 55% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-13900KF - CA$1.42 vs CA$3.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-10600 - 214 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 32 vs 12 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$255
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.17/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$678.98
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$678.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |