Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$227.99 vs CA$1617.19
- Up to 85% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.82 vs CA$5.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i5-10600 - 287 vs 278 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 16 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
278
96.86411149825784%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$227.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$227.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58238 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.63/FPS
14.564831261101244%
Price, CA$
CA$1617.19
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,617.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58237 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1579
68.95196506550218%
Multi-Core
6175
57.46859004187994%
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |