Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 28% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 59 vs 46 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
59
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6666 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |