Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600 is 559 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-9600 - CA$157.24 vs CA$325.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-9600 - CA$0.61 vs CA$1.26 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-10400F - 258 vs 257 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
257
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6779 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
258
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
48%
Price, CA$
CA$325
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6779 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-9600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |