Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i5-2435M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3164 days newer than Core i5-2435M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-2435M - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2435M - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2435M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-2435M |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | No |