Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$157.24 vs CA$319.02
- Up to 48% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600 - CA$1.16 vs CA$2.25 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-10400F - 142 vs 135 FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7654 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.25/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$319.02
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$319.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7653 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |