Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 576 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 184 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$157.24 vs CA$1881.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$0.85 vs CA$10.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 48 vs 12 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5510 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
183
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$10.28/FPS
8%
Price, CA$
CA$1881
8%
Buy for CA$1,881 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5510 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |