Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 576 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 217 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$138.51 vs CA$1791.28
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 48 vs 12 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$138.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
214
98.61751152073732%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1791.28
7%
Buy for CA$1,791.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
85.88317107093185%
Multi-Core
7407
100%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |