Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 240 vs 237 FPS
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$157.24 vs CA$1180.39
- Up to 87% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$0.66 vs CA$4.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14127 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
237
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.98/FPS
13%
Price, CA$
CA$1180.39
13%
Buy for CA$1,180.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |