Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 114 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$129.99 vs CA$1393.07
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76361 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
109
95.6140350877193%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
9%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76361 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
81.43254520166899%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |