Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 6% better in New World than Ryzen 3 1300X - 115 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - CA$87.91 vs CA$134.99
- Up to 31% better value when playing New World than Core i5-10400F - CA$0.81 vs CA$1.17 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.17/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$134.99
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$134.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1002 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
108
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1000 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |