Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9350KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1092 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-9350KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-9350KF - 192 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-9350KF - CA$112.98 vs CA$351.73
- Up to 68% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-9350KF - CA$0.59 vs CA$1.86 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9350KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$351.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9350KF | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |