Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1253 days newer than Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-9100F - 168 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
46.20040349697378%
Multi-Core
3669
18.21024419297201%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |