Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 211 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Athlon 3000G - 127 vs 118 FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
127
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |