Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 31 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 161 vs 159 FPS
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$209.27 vs CA$1783.0
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 48 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$209.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76676 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
159
98.75776397515527%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1783
11%
Buy for CA$1,783 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
89.55765047135606%
Multi-Core
7407
100%
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |