Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 492 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 3% better in Remnant II than Core i7-6900K - 89 vs 86 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 91 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-8350K - CA$258.88 vs CA$318.88
- Up to 16% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i3-8350K - CA$3.01 vs CA$3.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 16 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
89
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.58/FPS
84%
Price, CA$
CA$318.88
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13622 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
86
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$258.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |