Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$139.99 vs CA$949.57
- Up to 83% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$0.33 vs CA$1.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 91 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-8350K - 490 vs 418 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
418
85.3061224489796%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
490
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.94/FPS
17.010309278350515%
Price, CA$
CA$949.57
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$949.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1474
50.51405071967101%
Multi-Core
4238
21.58610502725004%
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |