Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 781 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$190.2 vs CA$1125.0
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-8100 - 229 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 48 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$190.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
229
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1125
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1245
74.68506298740252%
Multi-Core
3405
25.56882180671322%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |