Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 363 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$125.0 vs CA$726.1
- Up to 83% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.04 vs CA$6.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$125
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
120
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.05/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
17%
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |