Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1129 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Celeron G1820 - 202 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 53 vs 60 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
33.81542699724518%
Multi-Core
825
28.715628263139575%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 60 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
