Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 915 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-7350K - 111 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
111
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$380
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$380 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15505 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |