Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Core i3-7300T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1827 days newer than Core i3-7300T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-7300T - 222 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300T - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$549.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1108
44.80388192478771%
Multi-Core
2363
18.115608708984972%
Intel Core i3-7300T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |