Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7300 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7300 is 848 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 120 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 51 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-7300
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
