Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 605 days newer than Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Core i3-7300 - 144 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
144
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1180.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,180.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18878 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |