Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7300 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7300 is 1910 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 12% better in Ready or Not than FX-8150 - 262 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |