Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2192 days newer than Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 48% better in Starfield than Core i3-7100T - 80 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
41.12011790714812%
Multi-Core
2260
13.758675270911969%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
