Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$125.0 vs CA$669.59
- Up to 77% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.73 vs CA$3.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i3-7100 - 208 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
171
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$125
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.22/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$669.59
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$669.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |