Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 664 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-6320 - 175 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 20 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1298
91.27988748241913%
Multi-Core
2618
29.814371939414645%
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |